Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Conan Shaheed (10 of 1984), Article 22 Representative of the evidence The parade of the three accused who were tried and convicted by the trial court, two were acquitted by the High Court and one was sentenced to life imprisonment. Listened. The accused was neither known as the prosecution's witnesses nor was his name listed in the FIR nor any identity was dropped, because the accused's face was not known to the prosecution's witnesses. Didn't know and his name was not mentioned in the FIR, so it was more important that the prosecution was under an obligation to hold the identity parade of the accused beyond any doubt To prove his case against, no evidence was available on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime, because, according to prosecutor's testimony, Whether the two accused were acquitted by the High Court High Court Convoy was a much better and more fair case for even firing a shot at the accused. The accused were not cited and serious illegal action was taken on the basis of any evidence, while the evidence was completely false, the prosecution had failed to prove the charges against the accused and the High Court It was also proved that the prosecution had succeeded in establishing its case against the accused and was not wrong. Sustainable Supreme Court reverses the results and allows the appeal to be set aside by the High Court verdict on the accused acquitted best law firms from Manga Mandi lawyer