Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus TRUSTEES OF HAJI SIR ABDULLAH HAROON WAKF NO.1

Sections 15 (2) (vi), (3) (4) and 21 of the Sindh Cultural Heritage (Protection) Act (XII of 1994), Sections 6 and 10 (3) of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the tenants. An attempt was made on the basis of the demolition of the building and the reconstruction of the destroyed premises on the basis of which the proper authorization and approval was obtained from the concerned authorities. The applicants' position was that the building was demolished. Was tried / protected heritage as a rental controller. No jurisdiction to prosecute them was stated. The object was rejected and ordered to be evicted The Respondent Trust had already passed the appropriate request against the relevant authorities against the incorporation of the building into the security heritage schedule, which was a sub judice rent controller. As well as directed by the Appellate Authority. That the execution of the eviction order would be subject to the order which could be granted at the request of the respondents The attackers were that in the case of the reconstruction of the under-construction building, they could be placed in an inappropriate position and advocated in their possession. The newly constructed premises could not be located along the proportional area of the online record, which was presented by the respondent trust. Subject to clearance for the proposed demolition by the government, after the construction of the building, the rights of the applicants will be fully protected, no other point was taken by the Supreme Court to deliver the decision, submitted by the petitioner. Respondent Trusts Deald in Promise Case \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Dadu lawyer