The appearance and non-presentation of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX resulted in O IX, R 13 ex parte decree separating the defendants from the certification that the case was originally pending in the Senior Civil Judge's Court, It was transferred to different courts. Of which the defendants had no knowledge. Thus, there was sufficient justification for rejecting the previous order, for the defendant's counsel appearing in the trial court on previous dates, the issuance of a notice or his non-service was not the result, the defendant's lawyer The petition was postponed but it did not appear on the important date, nor did any explanation for its non-submission were made. Thus, there is no justification for the former parliament directory and the lower courts also kept it separate. Denying the request for was not valid.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
