Find a Lawyer

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Special Courts for Speedy Trials Ordinance 1987 Section 302/34 Faster Trials for Special Courts Act (XV of 1987), Section 5 Ocular Evidence, FIR filed within one hour immediately within one hour Names of witnesses and accused from whom related arms and role were played. They were given in the FIR: The possibility of acquiring witnesses also rejects the complainant for having a close relationship with the deceased and also alleges that the other two witnesses are respected and independent of the accused. It has nothing to do with the complainant or the enmity and is present in the house of the same witness. Probably fit the statements of the witnesses and the rest of the evidence. The cross-examination test was not successfully encountered. Any major or significant contradictions or dishonesty improvements shown in the evidence were properly rejected, trusted, and secure by the trial court prosecution evidence. Dependent without any co-operation which was found in the FP document which can be used to confirm the complainant while maintaining the circumstances. best advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer