MRS. ANIS HAIDER versus S. AMIR HAIDER
Application under section 12 (2), 141 and O VII, R 11 (a) section 12 (2), CPC which contains serious allegations of forgery and fraud that respond to O / VI, requesting R / Reject such request based on written statement. 11 (a), CPC CPC Accuracy Order VII, R 11, especially the suit and plates CPC will be attracted only when the plaintiff itself does not show cause for Order VII, R 11, CPC cannot be attracted to this. As the basis of a written statement, the initial burden will be on the plaintiffs / applicants to prove their case based on the claims filed in the petition so that legal proceedings with the parties cannot be taken as evidence, especially When its support was not even tested and tested by its maker. Opposition clause 141, CPC shall not be attracted to such request for recording of evidence on a pure and serious question of fact cannot be granted even without the impartial request of O VII, R 11, CPCCP could not decide on such request. A mere reply / written statement of the respondent without a recording of the principles of proof
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jhudo lawyer