Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants sought leave to appeal against the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court under which their punishment and punishment under Section 302 (b). Applicants' appeals were dismissed and sentenced. The death sentence given to them was upheld, with both courts simultaneously welcoming the prosecution's case affecting the applicant's confidence. That the testimony of the witnesses was consistent on material details. And these eyewitnesses, though related to it, were natural witnesses, saying the witnesses had been examined for a long time, but the role of the applicant as confirming their credibility, could not be found scattered. The incident was a widespread incident, both the applicants / accused were specially designated in the FIR and they were subjected to fatal shots, during the trial the prosecution proved the story narrated in the FIR. Was successful as long as the applicants were concerned, counsel for the applicants could not cite any evidence, if it was considered, could she persuade the court to interfere with the conclusions of the crime. In the course of the trial, there was no evidence that one of the applicants was studying in the school. One student had knowledge or was a decision that was unacceptable to apply for leave to appeal was dismissed for lack of merit law firms from Mian Walli lawyer