Find a Lawyer

MUAZ AHMAD versus HAJI MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Section 1 561A Panel Code, (XLV of 1860), Sections 6406, 9409, 9509 / Constitution34 Constitution of Pakistan (3) 33), Arts 199 and 185 ()) Termination of FIRF Defendants. On the petitioner's complaint filed against Alihan, the high court dismissed the constitutional petition filed by the respondents in the constitutional petition filed by the respondents directly without the intention of abolishing the FIR. Was presented as a party, it was neither put on notice nor the applicant was asked to explain his point of view; An appeal was sought for leave, stating that the two orders had been committed by the High Court before the law enforcement agencies by passing a negative order without giving the applicant a chance to be heard. ? The petitioner, in that manner, was seriously prejudiced and it appeared that the principles of natural justice were displeased. The petition was changed to appeal and, while allowing the same, the two orders were set aside by the Supreme Court. And the High Court was remanded to hear a rigorous case for hearing the constitutional petition. list of supreme court advocates from Daharki lawyer