Article 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. XVII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Failure to Attack Defendant's Defendant Failure to Prove Evidence, Many of the Tenants to Rent Despite offering opportunities, he did not. Therefore, his witnesses, his defense was severely attacked and the order of eviction was granted by the lower appellate court, as well as the High Court's order of eviction by the tenant controller Pliya. It also maintained that its defense was terminated without complying with the above parameters. In XVII, R3, many opportunities were offered to the tenant to provide proof to the CPC, but he failed, so it was finally decided to prove the tenant again after which date. Did not bother to do or appear in court itself. The statements of some witnesses were sworn in and that too by another person, thus, the tenant controller refused to intervene on behalf of the rent controller, in favor of the tenant's defense. e Refused to appeal the decision of the High Court on leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
