Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, LAHORE versus ZAMINDARA PAPER AND BOARD MILLS

R10 (2) (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Not to mention the specific rule in the showcase notice The High Court has, under the unwarranted decision, stated that since the showcase notice does not include a specific provision of law and The rules were the same ineffective and invalid, referring to the rules for identifying the valid time period during which the tax was allegedly excluded because the Central R10 sub-rules (2) and (3) the Excise Rules, 1944, were not mentioned; it was not appropriate to declare the showcases notice as illegal judgment of the High Court, was not sustainable, under technical conditions. Instead the court should keep in mind the issues from different angles. Whether complied with or if any of the by-laws were omitted, then what bias might the party facing which the notice was given no prejudice in the present case? The reason was because the relevant rules were complied with so that the appeal for leave of appeal was changed and allowed, the unclean decision was set aside and the case for that purpose was set aside. The collector was sent to Sales Tax and Central Excise. The case should be decided quickly online advocate from Chaininda lawyer