Find a Lawyer

MUBASHAR AHMED versus MST. ZAHIDA PARVEEN

Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) filed suit for the specific performance of the contract, in which the applicant did not deny the implementation of the agreement, but he subsequently wrote. Moved the request to allow the statement to be modified and denied execution. After eighteen years, the settlement agreement, which was eventually rejected by the High Court, was approved by the High Court. All three courts were justified in accepting the view that the applicant changed the basis. Had tried to Introducing a new element of refusal to enforce the agreement, the High Court had correctly stated that if the applicant has been allowed to amend his written statement after a period of 18 years, In the absence of any weakness in the legality, the defense will change. The High Court rejected the decision on the leave to appeal Pakistan, top advocate family court from Daur lawyer