Find a Lawyer

RAB NAWAZ versus FAIZ AHMAD

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 ocular evidence, although related to the complainant's inquiry, had no motive to falsely implicate the accused; the complainant's presence was present on the spot, immediately filed an FIR The complainant had stated that no time had been taken for false witnesses or collective action. They have no connection with the false story witnesses, nor do they have any enmity against the accused nor their presence on the spot. There were natural witnesses who did not suffer from instability, such as economic contradictions, major contradictions or dishonest reforms, the evidence of the remaining witnesses is also consistent with the rest of the evidence. There was no enmity against it. No trial error was found in the trial court's decision. The testimony of such witnesses can not be ignored by the trial court, defining the evidence according to the guiding principles. The punishment on the ship is sustained only because of their relationship property advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer