Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ DIWANA versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 1765, an allegedly unsatisfactory accused, who acted as a deputy messenger in the court of the Additional District Judge Accepted a certain amount of money as an illegal consolation to get an appeal. Before the court decided in favor of the prosecuting witnesses, along with the statements of the prosecution witnesses, before which the accused confessed to receiving money to pledge in favor of the complainant. At length, investigations were carried out against the witnesses, but nothing came on the record. Indicate that they were not telling the truth. Defending witnesses have been charged with antitrust evidence affecting Section R, CRPC also admitted that they confessed to their crime and apologized before the District Judge prosecution case against the accused. Which has been proved beyond any shadow. Undoubtedly, the sentence was retained power of attorney advocate Khuzdar lawyer