HABIB BANK LTD. versus NUSRAT NAHCCD
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the 161 witnesses who testified in support of the case made several statements that the accused received different amounts on different dates when the bribery witnesses At length the scrutiny was made, but the defense failed to bring any records on the record which suggested that it would not be safe to rely on their testimony. All the witnesses were poor laborers who were not known to the accused and there was no conflict of interest or enmity between the witnesses and the accused, the prosecution was. He was able to prove his case without any doubt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Jehanian lawyer
