The example of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 convictions was given by the witnesses who were related not only to each other but also to members of the same degree and there were lumbermen and several other persons. But none of them were asked to confirm the recovery so evidence of the weapon's recovery could not be relied upon. Eye witnesses made contradictory statements regarding the removal of the victim to the hospital, which lasted 26 hours. Unexpected delay of filing an FIR concluded that the delay should be due to And that the prosecution version of the FIR and was named a second witness was told that the deceased was hit in the chest by the suspect when the victim was sitting in the language. When the accused was standing down, it would have seemed impossible, as no one standing down could have succeeded in inflaming GA Chhuri seems to be hitting the upper part of the victim's chest, while having any such account while staying in the language. The account cannot be relied upon and if the testimony of the witnesses relies on the evidence of the motion, it will not be sufficient to maintain the conviction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
