DOST MUHAMMAD RAHIMOON versus ABDUR RAZZAK RAHIMOON
Sections 54, & 55 and Election 63 Limitation of the Election Request The notification of publication of the Official Gazette of the Representative Candidate named in Section 52 (2) of the Representation People Act, 1976, during the ban on the implementation of the required parties 3 was published on 2008 and the petition was filed on 8 8 2008 while the request to include the names of two more candidates since the respondents were filed on 3, 2008 while in relation to the candidates who applied in the memo. The petition was prepared in respect of the respondents but the two who did not actually join the respondents Against the candidates the limit was affected. The petitioner referred to the Election Tribunal or the Election Commission within the time limit provided by the representative for filing such application, the statement of the People Act, 1976, permitting the applicant to make such application was only formal But since the deadline has expired and interest has been levied on individuals, such an application cannot be allowed using the required word. In Section 454 of the Representation People Act, 1976, the Legislature made it mandatory for the applicant to include all candidates who participated in the election petition filed by himself and any other candidate against whom any He was charged with corruption or unlawful conduct resulting in instability. Representation of section 544 provided for in section 63 of the Public Representation Act 1976, by complying with the provisions of section 454 of the Act, the application can be dismissed if the representation is subject to Section 54A of the Public Act 1976
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
