KHUSHI MUHAMMAD versus ZAINAB
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Sections 4 and 15 pre-emption suit transfer contested on the basis that it was not a sale but an exchange and therefore, there was no final mutation as there was no final word. It has been concluded that despite the clear nature of the exchange, the bargaining was a sale and thus allowed the respondents to be pre-liberated, the final result of the fact reached by the aforesaid courts, notable. There were no hearings under which the decree was maintained under the court's order. Oral sales made by mutation were not empty
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer
