Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the tenant to exclude the personal requirement of the tenant dwarf approved by the tenant controller, the scope of the injunction was retained, the lower appellant about the tenant. The court in its justification statement revealed that the landlord wanted a suit shop for his personal use. And the fact that he was working with someone else in another shop. The landlord is in dire need of a landlord who had a tenancy agreement with the tenant of the shop but has not expired, so the landlord cannot take possession of the shop. The lower appellate court's finding was correct and, according to the law, which did not guarantee any High Court intervention in the constitutional jurisdiction, was excluded under these circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
