MST. MAJIDAN versus SHABIR AHMED
The decision was made in the case of a settlement agreement filed by the applicant before the Civil Procedure Code Order III, RR 2 and 6 Proofs Act (I of 1872) of CPC recognized agents and pliers A III. , They arrived at the applicants' special counsel's statements, but the applicant had already challenged the decree by calling it a forgery, that neither the applicant nor her husband had appointed a special settlement lawyer. The applicant's lawyer, who signed the settlement statement, presented the power of attorney with evidence so that the court The mist. Come to a conclusion whether the applicant's alleged attorney had exceeded his authority by making such a statement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Sajawal lawyer
