MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 illegally paid the payment, even though the raiding party observed, it was still used by the accused and the complainant. No conversation heard is the complainant who is the only authorized witness. Could have been aware of the conversation between him and the defendant did not support the prosecutor's version at the trial, it was not established in which circumstances and with what amount the money was changed against the accused. The crime was not proven
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Dunyapur lawyer
