Find a Lawyer

ROOPA SYED versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION

Article 199 Constitution Petition to Regulate the Civil Service of Service It was the applicant's case that after the completion of one year of service, the corporation continued to extend its service contract, instead of regularizing it, the applicant alleged. That the defendant / corporation did the job of defamation, and did not regulate its service to and with the spouse, while the services of its juniors were regularized while the applicant's performance was praised by his superiors It shows that she was working diligently with the respondent's agency and was accused of it at any time. Was not imposed, nor was the disciplinary and administrative action against him due to any mistake, act or omission, which, if any, was perceived by the applicant to be harmful to others. Together she was also considered to be a regular, she was on maternity leave, and of which her case was postponed for regular, after receiving her maternity leave, she appealed. To regulate her service, but she was neither heard nor regularized, and the applicant was not entitled to a proper hearing, but The unauthorized employee of N was condemned because he was not regularized because the applicant's longtime juniors were actually regularized, with no legitimate, legal and legitimate reason for such discrimination. Was. It will be in the fitness of the applicants that the applicant will appear before the appropriate / regular board of the employer corporation, which will regulate the applicant's qualities. pakistani advocates Kahror Pacca lawyer