MARKETING SERVICES INC. THROUGH PRESIDENT versus JULLUNDHUR (PVT.). LTD.
O XXVI, R 5 Sindh Chief Court Rules (oh section), R 195 la Correction Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court Appeal Local Commission, appointment of recording of evidence of plaintiff company, abroad Filed by the source, a Pakistani citizen living within the local court of the trial court, who was authorized to give evidence, on behalf of the plaintiff to appoint a local commission to record the evidence of his chief executive officer, who was overseas. The lawsuit was filed by Lawyer himself, who appointed his lawyer to file a lawsuit, to confirm the plaintiff. Submit the affidavit, affidavit, counter affidavit and give evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, therefore, the plaintiff could not demand an inspector from overseas, the plaintiff filed a petition for inspection of his chief executive officer's inquiry. And failed to give any compelling reason why the examination of its chief executive officer was necessary in appropriate cases in the suit validity court, where it was not appropriate for the witness to appear in court and to give evidence, if sufficient reasons were presented. So, the Commissioner may order a witness to be examined by the investigators, such as the Commission, the parties involved It cannot be made as a matter of scrutiny for Wii or his witnesses. The right court had the power to decide whether or not a cause was shown for the purpose of not presenting a person as a witness and examining it on the Commission, in the affidavit which the plaintiff's lawyer There was no reason why he was sworn in by the man who gave himself the authority to give evidence. An oath upon inquiry by its chief executive officer
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
