MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, on the basis of the evidence, the demand for the accused's filing and the receipt of payment of Rs. Instead of paying the complaint, a vice chairman, another witness, not knowing the amount of fees paid to exchange the constable, the prosecution's case against the accused did not prove beyond reasonable doubt. By giving the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Vehari lawyer
