MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE
Investigate the house of a police party consisting of 1/2 dozen armed officers and encircling the police party, the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 307 and 333/34 for the Special Courts, the Fast Cases Act (XV of 1987), Section 5 ocular evidence, 1/2 dozen armed officers. Raid on accused's house There was only one door of the house, the accused still managed to escape. The party's leader left the live cartridge on the spot with his rifle, leaving the rifle with no excuse for 12 days. He was picked up while the injured witness identified the suspect by voice although he could not be identified. Earlier and by designating two firefighters, the firearms indicate, but do not state in a statement before the police statement after 2/3 days that the doctor does not give a witness's unconscious statement or statement. Ineligible for: No FIR was filed by witness. The name of the raiding party complainant was not named by the witness, as the member of the raiding party, lying in the dark around the wounds allegedly happened at 4am 45 minutes. At 4 o'clock in the morning at DHQ Hospital. Inquiries for injuries were not investigated and the prosecutor's story of the witness's injuries was knocked out, the prosecutor was unsuccessful and the domestic charges against the suspects were beyond reasonable doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kundina lawyer