The alleged recovery of a gun at the release of the section 13 offender of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, when he was detained, was confirmed by a non-resident resident of the area from whom the gun was recovered. There was a long-standing enmity between the witness and the accused's contradictions, which included statements of the 7 witnesses and the investigating officer, about the time of the gun recovery, which was recovered from the place where the accused was not in exclusive possession, Was found, too, that the accused had the benefit of the doubt that the trial court had rightly given it in the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
