SNAFIQUDDIN QURESHI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT; KARACHI
Section 114 and AXLVII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petitioner petitioner requested a review of the order under which his two contempt requests were dismissed under which the applicant filed the basic. As a result of the harassment against the defendants, their complaint was raised. Under the circumstances of the respondents No 2 to 4 have been instructed not to cause any harassment, pressure or misuse or abuse of power, without the approval of the police officer by law. The petitioner, in turn, moved two contempt of court petitions, which were rejected in the presence of the applicant, no order was passed in the constitutional petition against the defendant, which it was alleged that The main contender for the High Court is a single judge, though he did not. Detailed reasons for rejecting the two contempt pleas were given, but in fact it had taken into account all the relevant aspects of the case, which also seemed to indicate that the applicant from time to time moved the petition directly to the High Court. In the habit of doing Government officials did not submit a case for review on the invalid order; the request for review, due to a misunderstanding, was dropped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer