ANWAR BIBI versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 25 Applicant's wife's transfer established a case for dissolution of marriage and a permanent injunction and before the respondent in two different courts against the respondent husband while in custody. Prevent the baby from snatching. Where the parties were married, the respondent husband subsequently filed a case for restoration of marital rights against his wife in the case. K \ Applicant wife is in danger of being a harassed woman and threatens to abduct her children. Similar questions of law and fact that had to go abroad for self-defense must arise in two suits; it would be in the interest of justice that both cases be heard by the husband of the same court in order to avoid a conflict of judgment. Will be The court was ordered to transfer both of them to the court in place F to restore pending marital rights against the applicant in a pending marriage dissolution and adjournment pending, where the petitioner filed a permanent petition. The injunction case is pending, so the total litigation between the parties must be dealt with by the same court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Larkana lawyer