Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SALEEM versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX temporarily injecting and interlocutory orders O VII, R 11 (d), O XLIII, R 1 (r) and O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2 temporarily hearing the appeal against the injunction First Appellate Court Turned the appeal into a temporary injunction against the revocation and dismissed the lower appellate court regarding the temporary injunction to restrict the same question. The occupation of the factory was not sustainable either. Respondent filed an application to the Assistant Commissioner who claimed that he was interested and had obtained an order under Section 145 CCPC for the factory sale. The defendant also brought a case for restraining the Assistant Commissioner to prevent him from intercepting the defendant / defendant or his possession from the factory sealing. The court granted a temporary injunction against the trial court for a temporary injunction CTC, but the Additional District Judge / Appeal Court took the view that this amendment regarding the trial court's trial changed it accordingly. Not only rejected the application for a temporary injunction but also rejected the applicant's position, which approves the provisional injunction under O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2, CPC was competent and the appeal was finalized in review. No, it was, while the appellate court found that under the wrongful provisions of section 147 (4), the CCP sought to maintain peace. The magisterial orders were issued to attach or seal the immovable property. The provisional injunction made by the civil court reverses the magisterial order passed by the civil court, otherwise the CRPC's addition to section 147 (4) pakistani advocates Nowshera Cantt lawyer