AKBAR ALI versus MUHAMMAD SABIR
The CPC temporarily violates the Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Courts Temporary Violations of Injections and Interlocutory Orders A-XXXXX, Rules Order 1 and 2 (3) and Section 115, That the applicants did not violate the provisional injunction issued in favor of the defendant on the record uncontested evidence but the applicants themselves acknowledged such infringement and pleaded mercy for the hold. , When a temporary injunction was violated by a party, the court found that the temporary injunction Applicants can be instructed to hold a month's detention in the civil jail for high courts, restoration of status quo in favor of the defendant and removal of the construction taken by the applicants regarding land dispute over violation of temporary injunction. But the revised order below the court and the applicant's detention order in the civil jail for a week instead of a month
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Burewala lawyer