Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus JALAL

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115, provides for the rights of the country owned by the court, as well as the applicant / defendant of the appellate court, from the defendant participating in the review against the judgment. Sue for a statement filed to declare ownership rights. Concerning the following courts, that there was no material on record to establish the respondent's ownership and the decisions of the two courts below were based on misrepresentation and incorrect record structure. Submitted a certified copy that was approved in a case. In the petition filed by him against the third person, the defendant was also a party and in which the defendant / plaintiff was declared the owner of the property, including the land in dispute, except for a measles judgment measuring nine. In pursuance of the mutation was also adopted the record of the revenue which was brought on record and presented in evidence, was declared by the respondent / claimant as the owner of the land which is wholly in the revenue record. Was applied, no part of his ownership could be taken from him. The decisions and orders of the courts in favor of the respondents / plaintiffs do not suffer from misrepresentation or misunderstanding. To the extent of a measles in which the nine-march is not measured, neither the courts below have committed litigation or illegal proceedings against all other lands. In response to court decisions and orders, nine measles have been measured except for one measles. inheritance advocates near Zahir Pir lawyer