CPC Order and Order Processing Rule Order XXI, RR 12, 30 and 58 Order No. 2 Implementation brought another person (appellant) to the firm that was formerly its sole proprietorship. And which had already been signed with Pakistan. The Railways and whose money was in possession of the latter, received the money order against Respondent No. 2 to the Railways and applied for its implementation, and the money received from it is lying with it. The objection was raised that the firm is not registered and the amount associated is not related. Defendant No. 2 but Hold, with the money firm, was the respondent No. 2 with whom the respondent Railway contracted to supply the goods and could be recovered by executing the order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
