Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASOOL versus ZAHEER AHMAD

The defendants denied, however, the tenant's request for a suede land tenure against the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), para 25 pre-emption suit. About their own being denied. In his written statement it is urged that the effect of the disputed petitions before the sale process as the proprietor of the disputed land was the effect of some of the defendants that they had seized the disputed land as a tenant. This minor defendant was described by a guardian ad that they seized the disputed land under the agreement to sell the defendants registered Evidence regarding their possession before the execution of the registered sale deed in their favor. Defendants 'defendants' arguments deny, therefore, that the suit land was not occupied before. The execution of the registered sale deed in their favor, as evidenced by the evidence on record law firms from FR Kohat lawyer