Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

LAL DIN versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF


The Colonial Law of the Public Land (Punjab) Act, 1912, section 24 and 27, temporary cultivation under section 24 is not required before the re-issuance of the schedule tenancy notice.

P L D 1961 W P (Rev.) 25

Before M. W. Abbasi, Member, Board of Revenue,

West Pakistan

LAL DIN‑Petitioner

versus

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Revision No. 2 of 1959‑60, decided on 23rd January 1960, District Sargodha.

Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (Y of 1912),

Ss. 24 and 27‑Temporary cultivation lease a "schedule tenancy " Notice under S. 24 not necessary before passing order of resumption.

ORDER

This is a revision petition against an order dated 30‑6‑1959, passed by the Commissioner, Rawalpindi Division, whereby he has dismissed the petitioner's appeal.

The facts of the case are that the petitioner was granted State land on temporary cultivation conditions which required that the land must be cultivated by the grantee himself as clarified by the Punjab Government Letter No. 650‑TH dated the 17th July 1952. The petitioner, however, sublet the land to one Fazle Shah in Kharif 1958. This fact was checked by the Colony Assistant, exercising the powers of a Collector, on the spot and admitted by the petitioner before him. In Rabi 1959, however, he obtained the Girdawri report in his favour, it is said, by collusion with the Patwari. This Girdawri report has been rejected both by the Collector and the Commissioner. The petitioner now tries to explain away the entry for Kharif 1958 by saying that he had only sold the crop to Fazle Shah and that Fazle Shah was not his sub‑tenant.

This is clearly an after‑thought and I see no reason to disagree with the concurrent finding of the two Courts below.

A legal issue has been raised to the effect that a formal notice under section 24 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act was not served on the petitioner. But section 27 of the Coloniza tion of Government Lands Act, 1912 amended by the Amendment Act of 1944 excludes the application of section 24 to scheduled tenancies and the Punjab Government Notifications Nos. 2664‑C dated the 22nd September 1944 and 3662‑C dated 6‑12‑1944, made applicable to temporary cultivation leases under the aforesaid Punjab Government Letter No. 650‑TH dated the 17th July 1952, has declared these leases as scheduled tenancies under section 4 of the Colonization of Government Lands Act. It, therefore, follows that section 24 does not apply to temporary cultivation leases and the fact that no formal notice under section 24 was issued in this case does not vitiate the order of resumption passed by the Collector.

In effect the revision petition is dismissed.

K. M. A. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Kech lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.