MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus CHIRAGH BIBI
Transfer Property Act 1882 Section 54 The execution of documents sold by an uneducated, plain lotton and a working woman proved to be a crime of sale that affected the plaintiff without practicing false statements and fraud. Was where the court has the responsibility of the plaintiff duty. An overseas / illiterate woman, the defendant would need to prove not only that such a woman did not understand this transaction but also that she had freelance advice available before the execution of the document when the reality of such transactions was in court. It is the duty of the court to determine. To be satisfied on the basis of the evidence that the illicit benefit of the old, the weak and the illiterate was not taken to such standard, it could not be proved that the plaintiff committed the illegal sale of the term legally. ]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer