Find a Lawyer

MST. SAEEDA versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O. XXXX, Rr. 1 and 2, in filing a suit related to the same subject in the subsequent suit, disclosed the provision for a temporary injunction to protect the possession of the plaintiff in the subsequent suit. The plaintiff's ground that the plaintiff's land was above his / her share of the entitlement was that the plaintiff acted in a good manner by hiding the facts of the previous lawsuit; thus, he did not approach the court with a clear hand. , The plaintiff was granted by his conduct such arbitrary relief as the person seeking equity would have to issue such an application in the circumstances Was rejected \ \ r n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), MULTAN v. MULTAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST, MULTAN 2014 PLD 57
• ABID HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 61
• JAVED IQBAL v. State 2014 PLD 62
• MUHAMMAD BOOTA v. BASHARAT ALI 2014 CLD 63
• SARDAR KHAN v. NADIR ALI 2014 YLR 69
• YAQOOB alias QOBI v. State 2014 MLD 69
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGINAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN v. Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN 2014 PLD 72
• GHULAM YASIN v. ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PUNJAB 2014 PLC(CS) 73

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

top advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes