ABDUL HAMID PURI versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD.
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 Compulsory Land Acquisition Award The appellant's question was off the road and the appellant failed to present any evidence in support of his claim for better compensation presented by the respondent. The evidence shows that there is a dispute over the land, which is four squares away from the residential area and has no access, which is compensated by the Land Acquisition Collector's average sales price for the last 2/3 years. It was more profitable than its claims based on the average price of the year. Failure to provide evidence of any future sale of land in or around the estate so that the market value of the land was estimated to be higher than that obtained by the Land Acquisition Collector's trial court upholding award. The search was not tolerated in any way. Interference from the record was rejected in the judgment and in such cases the order passed by the trial court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
