Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/34 bail, grant of further investigation, although nominated in the FIR along with the other accomplices, did not assign a specific role to it. had gone. It was yet to be decided whether further investigations were pending against the accused, in which case the first accused was not presented to the trial court for more than a year and three months after his arrest and his He was also not produced before the trial court. For almost one year and nine months by prison authorities, for which no explanation was available in the diary of the trial, the failure of the trial authorities to present the accused before the trial and the trial No immediate action was taken for the immediate outcome of the hearing delay. The nature of the trial delay, in this case, should be examined at its own best, where the court will conclude that the delay is unknown, involuntary and unusual. Irrelevant and because the accused or any person on his behalf did not accuse him of causing the delay, the court may extend the bail to the accused, in the present case where the bail was extended on the basis of delay. It may be enough to ensure the accused's hearing to face a hearing. Fast and transparent trial should be a sign of criminal justice delivery
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
