ABDUL AZIZ versus BASHIR AHMAD
CPC Procedure for Civil Procedure Order IX and Consequences of Non-submission O IX, R 6 & O XVII, Rr 2 and 3 Evidence Ending for the filing of additional evidence by the defendant himself. Delayed request by written request on due date. Requested to postpone the hearing again on the date of adjournment, but the trial court rejected their request and the defendants could not appear for the documents to be displayed on that day. Consequently, the court closed the evidence of confession from the defendants sought by the plaintiff and not by the defendants, holding the trial court, could not bring the defendant's evidence even closer to the defendants. Even if no one appeared for it, the trial court could not close their evidence as they were merely to obtain. The documents exhibited which they were specifically allowed to present as additional evidence by the appellate court and the presence of their witnesses were not questioned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Qambar lawyer
