BEGUM TAHIRA SULTAN IN RE: versus BEGUM TAHIRA SULTAN IN RE:
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 96 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 265, 266 and 280 The repeal of the constitution of 1972, taking the oath of the constitution of 1973, demanded that the trial be adjourned because of the constitution (1972). The constitution (1973) was repealed on 10-4 1973, until the judges of the High Court did not take the oath of office under the new constitution after its enactment on 10 1973, hearing their case. Unable to do so, the Chief Justice refused to present the petitioner. Saying that if he is unable to take an oath under the new constitution, he will have no power to adjourn or refuse to grant, and the proper imitation he can act on is the status of a judge or chief justice of a high court. To refrain from doing anything. Assuming that the Constitution of 1973 was enacted, Article 275 clearly includes the Office of the Chief Justice, in which other judges of the High Court and the prescribed affidavit were in effect as soon as the date of the constitution began. Can be taken at
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
