Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALIAS KAKU versus THE STATE

Section 2 302/34 O Evidence, Defendant's Complaint, Defendant's Claimant's Father, Filing FIR With Enough Delay The complainant first went to Nikmard and then explained the delay to the police station, free of doubt. No and two witnesses claiming to be working as green at some other distance and 11 miles from the location of the incident, at the hearing of the complainant's complaint reached where the complaint was made. The complainant did not report to anyone on the way after the complaint except good luck which was not available. Until late last night, neither was presented at trial or cited in the witnesses' calendar. The complainant claimed to be present for cutting grass with the Wahola accused and the accused did not show any haula or grass police in the adjoining field, the other two witnesses to the complainant are closely related, to see the witness's land. Claiming to be present for registration advocate from Tarnol lawyer