MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 [MLR 1151 para 18 was the tenant of the disputed land that the applicant's admission to the land was accepted by the Deputy Land Commissioner. Such admission could not be accepted until the deputy land In the commissioner's view, the defendant was not. At the relevant time, the tenant also admitted that some of the land he had resumed was allotted, in order to decide on the merit of the question, the member agreed to ascertain the fact on the two entries in the Federal Land Commission remand case. It was decided who was entitled to the allotment. Held, after the confirmation of the status of both parties, was not appropriate and appropriate under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
