Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION


Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 [MLR 1151 para 18 was the tenant of the disputed land that the applicant's admission to the land was accepted by the Deputy Land Commissioner. Such admission could not be accepted until the deputy land In the commissioner's view, the defendant was not. At the relevant time, the tenant also admitted that some of the land he had resumed was allotted, in order to decide on the merit of the question, the member agreed to ascertain the fact on the two entries in the Federal Land Commission remand case. It was decided who was entitled to the allotment. Held, after the confirmation of the status of both parties, was not appropriate and appropriate under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Mustang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.