Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus HABIB ENTERPRISES LTD.


The Contract Act 1872 Section 56 Companies (Managing Agency and Elections of Directors) Order (2 of 1972), Article 6 disappointment is exposed to the disappointment of the contract as the result of the contract, which resulted in the contract. As a result, turnover was not discussed through the announcement of the Companies (Managing Agency and Election of Directors) Order, 1972, that all companies' contracts and agreements, which deal with the managing agents, Was applied, did not apply. Defendants, although independently of a third-party managing agent, agreed to disclose the obligation to comply with the required doctrine of frustration because the change brought by Order No. 2 of 1972 did not. Did not affect the contract in any way. In the suit

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.