BALUCH ART CENTRE versus PALACE HOTEL, ANNEXE
Indemnity Rentals on the basis of default in payment of rent by the rent controller 1979 Ordinance 15 Section 15 The tenant asserts that the notice of change of ownership by the person claiming to be the landlord was never Found and filed a takedown application against him. The order of withdrawal was obtained behind his back and that he was represented in court by an unauthorized person. It was supported by the tenant's documentation and a letter issued by the mayor of the municipal corporation to the Director Master Plan Department, and the premises in question were being used as commercial premises and, therefore, it was appropriate that justice be done. In the interest of, the order was ordered to set aside the prospective tenant on the inquiring tenant and the case has been remanded for further inquiry so as to present further evidence to the parties. May be allowed and according to law the matter should be decided in advance. 1982 CLC 1241; 1984 CLC 2684; PLD 1983 SC 155; 1983 SCMR 1205; 1986 CLC 1527 and 1987 CLC 1547 Ref.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Machi Goth lawyer