MUHAMMAD IDREES versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT SIALKOT
Section 55 Punjab Land Acquisition Rules, 1983, R14 (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the person affected by the restoration of the constitutional application to restore the original owners or their heritage of the acquired land. Relied on a letter from the railway authorities. That the land acquired by the railway may be abandoned in favor of the original owners as the purpose of acquisition is no longer available. The implementation of this letter was sought by the applicant through a constitutional request so that the land could be restored to the applicant at the original cost. Can be The Railway Authorities did not create any right in favor of the High Court in the constitutional petition filed earlier by the petitioner on the same subject. The petitioner had directed the applicant to resolve his complaint. Apply before the Deputy Commissioner for Such an application was available on the record that the same W was listed or there was nothing pending on the record to show that the authorities did not need the land to avail themselves of the constitutional jurisdiction, The passenger must show that he is incensed should be a person, who has suffered legal damages. Complaint, against which a verdict has been made, which wrongfully deprives him of something or wrongfully denies it or wrongfully affecting the title of an angry person. Is the one who has encountered a legal error, the applicant should have moved the application before the Deputy Commissioner. The matter should have been decided in accordance with the law and should have followed this claim urgently. Without doing so, the applicant will no longer make this claim.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
