The applicant's name was not mentioned in the first informational report before the arrest under Section 498 Explanation Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34 and 120B bail, but it was included after the expiry of almost four years. Was when the applicant alleged that he had committed corruption and after his arrest he would be humiliated and harassed. The co-accused, the statement of approval and statements of other witnesses who were not eyewitnesses but were examined to provide assistance and to prove some of the documents, such as two decisions of the trial court and the High Court in the field. As a result, the two accomplices were acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
