Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

STATE versus SIKANDER HAYAT


Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 Prosecutor's witnesses do not support the prosecution's case while a prosecutor's witness confessed to his relationship with the complainant in the eyewitness statements The contradictions present were submitted in the wording but not independent witnesses were cited or examined as witnesses. The ocular evidence requires independent cross-examination, which was lost when the parties resolved their differences and the complainant's lawyer did not confirm the trial of the lawyer's case while the accused was acquitted. The evidence was found correctly and neither evidence was misrepresented nor the trial court's decision could be termed as invalid or illegal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.