Find a Lawyer

SAKHAWAI KHAN versus STATE

Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 (XLV of 18 (0)), Section 161 was charged with unlawful pleas, a clerk of the Department of Excise and Taxation has alleged that the accused was fined Rs. 200. The promise of paying Rs 900,000 for payment of tax and property tax deduction has not been conveyed to the accused in the presence of the raiding party, the fraudulent money D section P and the inspector anti-corruption, headed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, both witnesses complainant. And not listening to any conversation between the accused, the tainted money and the invoice form were recovered from the recipient, under the supervision of a magistrate No complainant's brother, only the witness paid Rs. 200 to the accused, proof of not being accepted as a second witness hearing No evidence of conscientious acceptance of the defaulted money by the accused to the accused. It did not satisfactorily explain its presence, was not based on defense weakness and the prosecution had to stand on its own legs. famous lower court advocate from Samma Satta lawyer