SARFRAZ ALAM versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND
Under Pakistan Constitution (1973), RRR 546, 574 and 723, Section 193 under-trial detainees involved in the execution of prisoners under arrest, of which twenty-eight persons were related to robbers, one was killed and three were sent to the Hood Ordinance Superintendent of Prison. The authority to impose boxes was given to detainees in relation to dangerous detainees, as punishment and precautionary measures were provided. Such power is limited to a maximum of six months and is then permitted (if the jail term. If the inspector general is required, the superintendent prison does not have such endorsement on the date sheet. The applicant was present but it was also confirmed that the approval of Inspector General Prisons was obtained from the Superintendent Prisons in a letter to the Inspector General of Prisons in which he asked for permission to bury the inland prisoners. Which included the name of the applicant. Action taken by the jail superintendent, not a case in point.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Minchanabad lawyer