Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus STATE


The presence of witnesses at the site of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 2?2 / 34 incident was established by the evidence on record, there was no enmity between the parties and no one was charged before the incident. The co-accused has been accused of confessing that the Ocular account given by eyewitnesses to the defendant was apt and appropriate to assist the accused in obtaining the motive to go to the death of the accused. There is no material contradiction or significant defect to prove the offense against the accused, which provides for the cause of the trial court's finding or Interference in other prosecutors' testimony was not examined because the evidence was inconsistent and their statement against the accused was not contradicted by the defense prosecution. Thus, a prosecution case was established against the accused and His conviction was upheld.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.