MUHAMMAD RASHID versus STATE
The presence of witnesses at the site of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 2?2 / 34 incident was established by the evidence on record, there was no enmity between the parties and no one was charged before the incident. The co-accused has been accused of confessing that the Ocular account given by eyewitnesses to the defendant was apt and appropriate to assist the accused in obtaining the motive to go to the death of the accused. There is no material contradiction or significant defect to prove the offense against the accused, which provides for the cause of the trial court's finding or Interference in other prosecutors' testimony was not examined because the evidence was inconsistent and their statement against the accused was not contradicted by the defense prosecution. Thus, a prosecution case was established against the accused and His conviction was upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer
