In the payment of the rent, the tenant of Sindh, the Ordinance of 1979, in the provision of 15 fair rent, the rent controller accepted the removal request filed by the landlord and ordered the eviction of the tenant, which the tenant confirmed. It was filed for the purpose of fixing the rent, but in favor of eliminating it, the tenant and the lessee M. rent were ordered by the rent controller, which was also confirmed by the tenant of the High Court. Another application for rehabilitation was made on rent which was already pending the rental action. Was originally made. Standing in line with the High Court order and the rent controller was unable to pass any order in the pending maintenance proceedings, the order passed by the rent controller in the maintenance proceedings was not invalid and the rent controller up to this point. There was no error in reaching.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
