RAFIQUNISA versus SHAHABUDDIN
The rent was not complied with by the tenant and was not complied with by the tenants, and no satisfactory explanation was presented as to the contentious rate of the rental, and it was stated that it was Rs 120 per month. Is not Rs. 300 The tenant claimed that his lawyer had wrongly admitted the rent rate to Rs 300 per month by appearing before the Controller on the rent, in a written statement confirming that the rent rate is Rs 300 per month, not the tenant. Collects dues and not future rentals. @ 300 rupees and the receipts shown by him indicate that he submitted a monthly rent of Rs 120, the tenant failed to comply with the rent controller's order, which would not have been sustained by any living conditions. Was not subject to the order of instability.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer
